
Alberto Contador. Photo: Getty Images
Alberto Contador is without a doubt the best Grand Tour rider alive today; this is a big call, but it is true.
Alberto Contador is without a doubt one of the most arrogant riders alive today; this is not a very big call – and it is just as true!
Contador is one of only a handful of riders to have won all three grand tours (tour de France, Vuelta a Espana, and the Giro d’Italia) and he is the clear favourite to win this years Tour! Contador won last years tour in impressive form, making even the great Lance Armstrong look frail, old and weak. When Contador rides his fans (solely located in Spain) affectionately call him ‘el pistolero’ (the gunner), for he is as fast as a bullet and his signature celebration is to shoot imaginary pistols into the air as he crosses the line. When I first heard that he was called el pistolero I assumed from my limited Spanish that it had something to do with car pistons, as his legs are almost mechanical when he is racing up a mountain.
Since 2006 Contador has won every Grand Tour he has entered. He is a freakishly good cyclist.

The similarities to Contador are uncanny
I have used this analogy before but it still holds true – when Contador races he looks like the bad guy from terminator 2! You know, the creepy cop made out of liquid metal that just won’t die! Even when Arnold Schwarzenegger freezes him with liquid nitrogen and then shoots him into a thousand little pieces he still manages to re-form and chase John Connor – humanities only hope!
The only way to kill him is to throw him into a vault of liquid hot magma and destroy his Cybernet chip. We can change tomorrow, today! We can stop SkyNet!
But I digress. Back to Contador.
Contador was always a talented up and coming rider, thus it was no great surprise when he won in the 2007 Tour. But that is where things started going really wrong for the pistol. In 2008 he was not allowed to compete in the Tour for his alleged involvement in the controversial Operacion Puerto doping scandal that plagued so many cyclists including Vinokourov and Valverde.
Contador was cleared of all wrongdoing, but because his team was involved he was banned from riding. That would make anyone angry, especially a cocky rider like Contador.
And so he did what most good emos do and he repressed his anger, allowing it to boil up nice and strong and then giving it one outlet: no, not rock music and eye liner, but an uncompromising desire to win!
Win he did in 2009 and then 2010. Both times out classing Lance Armstrong and out powering Andy Schleck. He returned to cycling the undisputed king of the Tour.

Press Conference - denying his guilt. Photo: AFP/Getty Imgaes
But of course there is more to Contador’s story. During a rest day in last year’s Tour Contador underwent a standard drug test, one of many he would have done during the 3-week race. His sample was sent away for testing and came back positive for a banned performance enhancing substance: Clenbuterol.
Contador held a press conference and blamed the test result on some contaminated steak while asserting his innocence. He was immediately banned from all competitive races, though by this stage his season had finished so it had no real impact on his cycling. Early this year in January the Spanish Cycling Federation handed down a one-year ban on Contador for the test results. Contador challenged this ruling – saying that the amount detected was so small that it would not have helped him anyway. The highly unbiased Spanish Cycling Federation decided that this was reasonable and overturned the ban allowing him to compete in all his planned 2011 races.
This was not cool. Even if it was because of contaminated steak and Contador had no intention of taking the substance, you can’t give leniency to riders in this situation. Every cyclist in the Tour knows you only drink water that is given to you by your race manager and you only eat food that has been specially prepared by your nutritionist. Otherwise you open the gate to riders taking drugs and then blaming it on factors outside their control – water that was given them by a spectator, or dinner in a restaurant that someone must have contaminated. With cycling’s already damaged reputation you just can’t allow this! This may sound harsh, but it is the world of professional cycling.

The Tour certainly has baggage. Photo: SOJKA WLADYSLAW
Now there is another body that governs cycling (UCI) and once the Spanish let Contador off without a suspension they called him to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to get a more just verdict. Unfortunately Contador’s lawyers have managed to get this trial delayed till August i.e. after the Tour, and so Contador is free to compete in (and probably win) the Tour.
So if you see people booing at Contador or calling him a “cheat” you now know why.
What do you think? Do you think it is fair to punish Contador for something that did not enhance his performance and he most likely didn’t intend to do; or does he need to be punished to keep the bar raised high?